Ecommerce Product Videos
That Do The Selling
While You Restock.

It depends on the channel, and Moosky exports for all of them from one project. Amazon listing videos run in the gallery at 1:1 or 16:9; Shopify product videos look best in a square or 4:3 on most themes; Etsy allows a video in the first gallery slot alongside your nine images, where vertical 9:16 fills the tile best on mobile. Story the product once in Project Director and export the cut each placement needs: wide for the product page, square for the feed grid, vertical for the mobile-first slots. Same footage, no reshoot.

Yes, and that's where the economics get good. Sellers don't run one video, they run a catalog: so you keep one Project Director workspace per brand and feed each SKU its own pack shot into the same brief. The scene plan, the camera behavior, and the lighting language carry across the line, which means the fortieth SKU's video looks related to the first, not like a different brand made it. You pay per clip, see the credit price before each render, and can leave lower-priority SKUs as drafts until they earn a hero pass.

Most single-SKU listing videos land in the low tens of dollars of credits, depending on clip count and how many takes you keep. The credit price of every render is shown before you press generate, and drafting on the fast lane costs a fraction of the premium pass, so the usual pattern is: story cheap, keep one hero clip per SKU, and only pay premium on your best sellers. Credits buy at 100 per dollar, never expire, and there is no subscription. A/B-proving video on ten SKUs before touching the whole catalog is the move.

Project Director works from locked references, so your product photography, packaging, and brand style stay consistent scene to scene and SKU to SKU. You attach the reference pack once and every clip in the project inherits the same visual language: the same white balance, the same motion grammar, the same end-card structure. That is the difference between a listing gallery that reads as one brand and a pile of unrelated clips. Overlays for your logo and tagline go on inside the project, so every export ships pre-branded.

It starts from your real pack shot, so the label, colors, and proportions are the ones you uploaded. Motion fills in around the frame you provide, which is why feeding a clean, well-lit hero photo beats a cluttered lifestyle shot. For anything a buyer must rely on, keep the accurate stills as the record and let the video do what stills can't: show the pour, the unfold, the fit. Sellers who do that consistently report fewer 'it looked different' returns, because the clip set the expectation the product then met.

No. The workflow is a chat and an upload: describe the product and the mood, attach the photo, and the agent plans the scenes, generates the takes, quality-checks them, and assembles the cut. If a clip isn't right you say so and re-run that scene, the same way you'd message an editor, without opening a timeline. Sellers use it the way they use a product photo app, not the way a post-production house uses a NLE.